What’s the Difference?
Mediation
Best for
- Couples who are on relatively good terms
- People who feel comfortable speaking up for themselves
- Simpler situations with fewer emotional or financial complications
Pros
- Often quicker and less expensive
- Neutral and non-adversarial
- Encourages cooperation
Considerations
- No legal advice during the process
- Not ideal if there’s a power imbalance
- If negotiations break down, you may still end up in court
Collaborative Practice
Best for
- Couples with children
- Complex emotional or financial issues
- People who want more support through the process
Pros
- Full legal guidance throughout
- More support for emotional and financial matters
- Designed to preserve relationships and co-parenting dynamics
- Focuses on long-term solutions, not just legal rights
Considerations
- Involves more professionals upfront, so it may seem more expensive, but often saves money in the long run
- Requires commitment from both parties to resolve things collaboratively
Which One Is Right for You?
If you and your spouse can communicate well and don’t need legal guidance during negotiations, mediation might be a good fit.
If you want more support, need legal advice along the way, or have more complex emotional or financial matters to sort out, Collaborative Practice could be the better choice.
Still unsure?
We can help you decide which option makes the most sense for your situation.
Reach out to speak with one of our experienced family lawyers, we’re here to guide you every step of the way.